• Asks about damage to US economy from oil holding $10 higher than expected range amid Iran war uncertainty.
    Matt Miller
  • Priya Misra
    Oil price shock hurts growth as a tax on consumer; it's a supply-side shock with small drag but doesn't create second-order inflation threat.
    We came into this shock with resilient private sector balance sheets. The Fed will be watching second-order effects. It keeps Fed from hiking, maybe from doing anything right away, but later cuts possible.
  • Questions how much more consumer can handle after prior inflation, tariffs, and now Middle East conflict.
    Matt Miller
  • Priya Misra
    Consumer has been extremely resilient due to easy financial conditions and K-shaped recovery; upper part buffered by jobs and stock market, lower part struggling.
    Resilience depends on job market; as long as layoffs stay low, consumer can withstand more shock.
  • Asks about CPI expectations and Fed's inflation target credibility.
    Matt Miller
  • Priya Misra
    Fed has dual mandate and was hit with supply shocks; bar for cuts is higher, need to see inflation improvement.
    Watching core services, inflation expectations, wage inflation, and rents for comfort. Once tariff impact flows through and no second-order energy inflation effect, might get to 2.5% by year-end allowing Fed cuts.
  • Asks about rates amid safe-haven demand vs. deficit/debt concerns and petrodollar issues.
    Matt Miller
  • Priya Misra
    Value created in rates market; rates rose due to inflation/deficit fears and deleveraging; owning belly of curve makes sense as supply shock is tax on consumer.
    If oil prices go much higher into tail-risk scenario causing recession, Fed would cut more. As market prices non-linear growth impact, interest rates likely to decline.
© 2025 - marketGuide.cc About Us, and Privacy

We tailor state-of-the-art business-driven information technology.

bitMinistry