• Introduces Paul Taubman, notes his previous sober view on 2026 deals, and asks how adding war risk shapes his current view.
    Dani
  • Paul Taubman
    Current view is realistic, not sober. Baseline is record 2025 M&A, but world faces uncertainty and volatility. Two flagged risks: geopolitical and AI disruption. Both are mispriced.
  • Asks what happens to M&A volumes for 2026 once the market fully realizes these risks.
    Dani
  • Paul Taubman
    Long-term secular view: M&A activity should increase as world speeds up, forcing CEOs/boards to adapt, pair portfolios, focus on core competencies, onshore, control supply chains (vertical integration), and consolidate for scale to afford AI investments. Long-term bull.
  • Asks if existential AI and war risks could delay or shorten the window for deal recovery.
    Dani
  • Paul Taubman
    Tail risks and unintended consequences from hostilities (energy choke points, ripple effects on consumer/ecosystem) make it hard to know where things settle. Underlying need to transact is strong; it's a matter of time.
  • Asks about AI implementation at PJT Partners.
    Dani
  • Paul Taubman
    Using AI as a tool to make best bankers more productive and give better advice, not to shrink workforce. Starting with senior bankers for greatest uplift. Moving cautiously due to rapid change.
  • Asks how Trump administration's focus on affordability impacts regulatory environment for M&A, especially consumer companies.
    Dani
  • Paul Taubman
    Administration is pro-growth, cutting regulation (e.g., 400 early HSR terminations vs. 6-7 in 2024). However, horizontal consolidation that risks consumer price increases may be a 'no-fly zone' due to affordability focus.
© 2025 - marketGuide.cc

We tailor state-of-the-art business-driven information technology.

bitMinistry